<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Demands $1.6 million for neighbor noise, $52 million for involving reporter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/03/demands-1-6-million-for-neighbor-noise-52-million-for-involving-reporter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/03/demands-1-6-million-for-neighbor-noise-52-million-for-involving-reporter/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Phaedrus		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/03/demands-1-6-million-for-neighbor-noise-52-million-for-involving-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-117471</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Phaedrus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22098#comment-117471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Heaven help them all if dry cleaners or pants become involved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heaven help them all if dry cleaners or pants become involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Burgess		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/03/demands-1-6-million-for-neighbor-noise-52-million-for-involving-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-117462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Burgess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22098#comment-117462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The leases for various hard-floored apartments I&#039;ve rented have specified that X% (usually 75%-80%) of the floors must be covered by carpet or rug, specifically for noise-abatement. I&#039;m surprised that a million-dollar condo doesn&#039;t have similar language in its agreements.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leases for various hard-floored apartments I&#8217;ve rented have specified that X% (usually 75%-80%) of the floors must be covered by carpet or rug, specifically for noise-abatement. I&#8217;m surprised that a million-dollar condo doesn&#8217;t have similar language in its agreements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DensityDuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/03/demands-1-6-million-for-neighbor-noise-52-million-for-involving-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-117439</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DensityDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22098#comment-117439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My HOA has a rule that says you&#039;re not allowed to &quot;modify the interior of your property so as to increase noise transmission into adjoining properties&quot;, and I always kind of wondered what the deal was there.  I guess this is what it&#039;s about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My HOA has a rule that says you&#8217;re not allowed to &#8220;modify the interior of your property so as to increase noise transmission into adjoining properties&#8221;, and I always kind of wondered what the deal was there.  I guess this is what it&#8217;s about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
