<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Man Charged With Wiretapping for Using Phone During Traffic Stop&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/man-charged-with-wiretapping-for-using-phone-during-traffic-stop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/man-charged-with-wiretapping-for-using-phone-during-traffic-stop/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Fembup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/man-charged-with-wiretapping-for-using-phone-during-traffic-stop/comment-page-1/#comment-118546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fembup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22501#comment-118546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So THAT&#039;s how I can shut up this very annoying guy every morning on the 6:18 out of New Haven.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So THAT&#8217;s how I can shut up this very annoying guy every morning on the 6:18 out of New Haven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben Catoe		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/man-charged-with-wiretapping-for-using-phone-during-traffic-stop/comment-page-1/#comment-118541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Catoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22501#comment-118541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Speaking as someone without any legal education, isn&#039;t the point of wiretapping laws to prevent someone from being recorded without their knowledge.  In many cases, the police know they are being recorded since THEY are also recording, therefore, they should not have a case.  The fact that both parties are recording doesn&#039;t change anything.   In this particular case, it is absurd to claim that being able to overhear the officer in the background is wiretapping.   By that definition, nearly every phone call in a public area is wiretapping.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone without any legal education, isn&#8217;t the point of wiretapping laws to prevent someone from being recorded without their knowledge.  In many cases, the police know they are being recorded since THEY are also recording, therefore, they should not have a case.  The fact that both parties are recording doesn&#8217;t change anything.   In this particular case, it is absurd to claim that being able to overhear the officer in the background is wiretapping.   By that definition, nearly every phone call in a public area is wiretapping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: VMS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/man-charged-with-wiretapping-for-using-phone-during-traffic-stop/comment-page-1/#comment-118403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22501#comment-118403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is the law in question: http://nhdcyf.info/rsa/570-a.html#570-A-2

A strict reading would seem to bar the police from having surveillance cameras (with audio) in their police stations or stores from having surveillance.  Too bad that they are using this law to harass individuals. What happened to &quot;live free or die?&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the law in question: <a href="http://nhdcyf.info/rsa/570-a.html#570-A-2" rel="nofollow ugc">http://nhdcyf.info/rsa/570-a.html#570-A-2</a></p>
<p>A strict reading would seem to bar the police from having surveillance cameras (with audio) in their police stations or stores from having surveillance.  Too bad that they are using this law to harass individuals. What happened to &#8220;live free or die?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/man-charged-with-wiretapping-for-using-phone-during-traffic-stop/comment-page-1/#comment-118402</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22501#comment-118402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would appear that this incident gives a lie to their state motto.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that this incident gives a lie to their state motto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
