Comments on: Wal-Mart v. Dukes symposium at Point of Law https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/wal-mart-v-dukes-symposium-at-point-of-law/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:17:13 +0000 hourly 1 By: William Nuesslein https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/04/wal-mart-v-dukes-symposium-at-point-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-118753 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:53:23 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=22524#comment-118753 As I understand it, Wal-Mart as a company discriminated by enforcing its non-discrimination policy with inadequate gusto. Why shouldn’t that logic apply to the EEOC?

Sadly we have too many, especially Associate Justice Ginsberg, who do not understand that a free market automatically polices against prejudicial discrimination. If the market pays 59 cents to women for every dollar paid to men, then a greedy capitalist will hire talented women for 65 cents or so. Discrimination policy forces people to meet political tests against economic tests. The argument for discrimination in pay rates was debunked more than twenty years ago.

]]>