Comments on: Anti-speech “superinjunctions” in the U.K. https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/05/anti-speech-superinjunctions-in-the-u-k/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Mon, 23 May 2011 05:12:39 +0000 hourly 1 By: U.K.: “Judge issues gag order for Twitter” https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/05/anti-speech-superinjunctions-in-the-u-k/comment-page-1/#comment-121789 Mon, 23 May 2011 05:12:39 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=22788#comment-121789 […] “A British judge has banned Twitter users from identifying a brain-damaged woman in one of the first attempts to prevent the messaging website from revealing sensitive information.” The woman’s mother wishes to cut off her life support. [Reuters, related] […]

]]> By: Hugo S. Cunningham https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/05/anti-speech-superinjunctions-in-the-u-k/comment-page-1/#comment-119323 Mon, 02 May 2011 16:22:01 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=22788#comment-119323 I sympathize with bona-fide privacy injunctions. “Ain’t nobody’s business if you do.”

I share opposition, however, to injunctions that cover up issues of political or scholarly controversy.

]]> By: Steve https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/05/anti-speech-superinjunctions-in-the-u-k/comment-page-1/#comment-119313 Mon, 02 May 2011 13:31:01 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=22788#comment-119313 And of course they are totally useless, it only takes a few minutes with giggle to find who it is.

]]> By: Mark Phaedrus https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/05/anti-speech-superinjunctions-in-the-u-k/comment-page-1/#comment-119300 Mon, 02 May 2011 03:23:26 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=22788#comment-119300 I’m not allowed to comment on this post. Wait, I wasn’t supposed to say that. Crap. Is there an attorney in the house?

]]>