<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Disabled man puts the squeeze on [NYC] businesses with handicap lawsuits&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/disabled-man-puts-the-squeeze-on-nyc-businesses-with-handicap-lawsuits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/disabled-man-puts-the-squeeze-on-nyc-businesses-with-handicap-lawsuits/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:31:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/disabled-man-puts-the-squeeze-on-nyc-businesses-with-handicap-lawsuits/comment-page-1/#comment-122636</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23289#comment-122636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Do we chalk it up to the “unintended consequences of an otherwise altruistic piece of legislation?” &lt;/i&gt;

As we know, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. However, it didn&#039;t take an Einstein to foresee the consequences of a law in which Congress did not explicitly spelling out what was required of businesses, but rather left it to the Courts to decide what was and was not legal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do we chalk it up to the “unintended consequences of an otherwise altruistic piece of legislation?” </i></p>
<p>As we know, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. However, it didn&#8217;t take an Einstein to foresee the consequences of a law in which Congress did not explicitly spelling out what was required of businesses, but rather left it to the Courts to decide what was and was not legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: antiredistributionist		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/disabled-man-puts-the-squeeze-on-nyc-businesses-with-handicap-lawsuits/comment-page-1/#comment-122632</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antiredistributionist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23289#comment-122632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ron Miller - please call your office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Miller &#8211; please call your office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Hoey		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/disabled-man-puts-the-squeeze-on-nyc-businesses-with-handicap-lawsuits/comment-page-1/#comment-122631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hoey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23289#comment-122631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Prior to its passage, I spearheaded the retail industry&#039;s efforts to rein in some of the excesses of the proposed ADA legislation. As part of my pitch to alert retailers to the perils of the law, I used to say that all I would need is a client in a wheelchair, and sooner or later I&#039;d own their companies, given the vague standards as proposed. Looks like some opportunists have recognized what I foresaw over 20 years ago.
Do we chalk it up to the &quot;unintended consequences of an otherwise altruistic piece of legislation?&quot; Tell that to the mom &#038; Pop enterprises driven under by these Plaintiffs and their lawyers, as it is small solace.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to its passage, I spearheaded the retail industry&#8217;s efforts to rein in some of the excesses of the proposed ADA legislation. As part of my pitch to alert retailers to the perils of the law, I used to say that all I would need is a client in a wheelchair, and sooner or later I&#8217;d own their companies, given the vague standards as proposed. Looks like some opportunists have recognized what I foresaw over 20 years ago.<br />
Do we chalk it up to the &#8220;unintended consequences of an otherwise altruistic piece of legislation?&#8221; Tell that to the mom &amp; Pop enterprises driven under by these Plaintiffs and their lawyers, as it is small solace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
