<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Whoops! Plaintiff Hired Lawyer First, Then Bought Product&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/whoops-plaintiff-hired-lawyer-first-then-bought-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/whoops-plaintiff-hired-lawyer-first-then-bought-product/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: captnhal		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/06/whoops-plaintiff-hired-lawyer-first-then-bought-product/comment-page-1/#comment-122817</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[captnhal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23414#comment-122817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To me this is obviously a scam.  If the lead plaintiff were truly concerned about the labeling, she would have read the label before making a purchase.  I also think 99% of the people who read the label after the fact would simply cease buying the product, or at worst, ask for a refund and be done with it.

I suspect that class action cases like this are quite common in that lawyers seek a plaintiff rather than the other way around.  Is it even logical that someone purchase iced tea and then look for a lawyer?  What makes this case unique is the carelessness of the lawyers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me this is obviously a scam.  If the lead plaintiff were truly concerned about the labeling, she would have read the label before making a purchase.  I also think 99% of the people who read the label after the fact would simply cease buying the product, or at worst, ask for a refund and be done with it.</p>
<p>I suspect that class action cases like this are quite common in that lawyers seek a plaintiff rather than the other way around.  Is it even logical that someone purchase iced tea and then look for a lawyer?  What makes this case unique is the carelessness of the lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
