Comments on: WSJ op-ed on same-sex marriage and religious exemptions

By: AMcA

AMcA — Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:24:49 +0000

@ Patrick:

I believe Paratrooper parachuted in from a planet that does not have a First Amendment, and just hasn’t seen ours yet. Nothing could be a clearer violation of the First Amendment than what he suggest.

Paranoia.

By: ParatrooperJJ

ParatrooperJJ — Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:24:00 +0000

Patrick – They have openly stated it many times.

By: Malcolm Smith

Malcolm Smith — Fri, 01 Jul 2011 01:37:32 +0000

What isn’t often mentioned is the obvious: that when governments permit religious exemptions, they are automatically admitting that their laws are immoral, because it is the Bible which is the ultimate source of morality. Or do they claim some higher form of morality?
I shall put it more bluntly: Where the hell do they get the idea that their standards are more valid than the word of God?

By: Patrick

Patrick — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:46:26 +0000

You should be well aware that the ultimate goal is to have priests put in jail and parishes asset forfeited for refusing to conduct same sex marriages.

What planet did you parachute from?

By: wfjag

wfjag — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:22:56 +0000

But, at least we’re teaching our women to fight.
“Female Special Operators Now in Combat” (June 29, 2011) http://www.military.com/news/article/female-special-operators-now-in-combat.html?ESRC=army-a.nl

By: ParatrooperJJ

ParatrooperJJ — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:06:25 +0000

Those exemptions will not last long. You should be well aware that the ultimate goal is to have priests put in jail and parishes asset forfeited for refusing to conduct same sex marriages.