<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: California workplace seating suits, cont&#8217;d	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/california-workplace-seating-suits-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/california-workplace-seating-suits-contd/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Darleen		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/california-workplace-seating-suits-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-124413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24023#comment-124413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[wait .. correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but didn&#039;t I just read somewhere that sitting is as dangerous to ones health as smoking? 

So why is the law requiring companies to provide something unhealthful to their employees?

(and what about the companies that are doing healthful stuff for their office personnel by bringing in standing desks??)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait .. correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but didn&#8217;t I just read somewhere that sitting is as dangerous to ones health as smoking? </p>
<p>So why is the law requiring companies to provide something unhealthful to their employees?</p>
<p>(and what about the companies that are doing healthful stuff for their office personnel by bringing in standing desks??)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Hoey		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/california-workplace-seating-suits-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-124404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hoey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24023#comment-124404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my years representing Woolworth, I would have these laws raised in some jurisdictions (NYC, HY State, MA, RI, to name but a few.) There were jump seats behind the old service counters, NEVER used in anyone&#039;s memory, and for a while, to placate local codes, they were placed near the ends of self service counters. These, too, were never used, and soon were abandoned. The employee lounges provided seats, and most local authorities accepted them, as they were readily accessible to the employees.
These laws were considered part of the packages of women&#039;s &quot;protective laws&quot; that were neutered by the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my years representing Woolworth, I would have these laws raised in some jurisdictions (NYC, HY State, MA, RI, to name but a few.) There were jump seats behind the old service counters, NEVER used in anyone&#8217;s memory, and for a while, to placate local codes, they were placed near the ends of self service counters. These, too, were never used, and soon were abandoned. The employee lounges provided seats, and most local authorities accepted them, as they were readily accessible to the employees.<br />
These laws were considered part of the packages of women&#8217;s &#8220;protective laws&#8221; that were neutered by the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
