<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Employee misconduct and ADA protections	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/employee-misconduct-and-ada-protections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/employee-misconduct-and-ada-protections/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/employee-misconduct-and-ada-protections/comment-page-1/#comment-123591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23709#comment-123591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;It’s worth remembering that the U.S. Supreme Court for a while attempted to interpret the ADA narrowly so as to focus the law’s benefits on traditional disabled groups&lt;/i&gt;

That wouldn’t include the Casey Martin decision where the Supreme Court rewrote the golf rules for the PGA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s worth remembering that the U.S. Supreme Court for a while attempted to interpret the ADA narrowly so as to focus the law’s benefits on traditional disabled groups</i></p>
<p>That wouldn’t include the Casey Martin decision where the Supreme Court rewrote the golf rules for the PGA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
