<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Attorney demand letters	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/attorney-demand-letters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/attorney-demand-letters/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Barney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/attorney-demand-letters/comment-page-1/#comment-125684</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Barney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24413#comment-125684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having reviewed maybe up to a thousand of these &quot;demand packages&quot; over the years, I have grown tired of the threatening tone taken in many of the demands.  However, the audience of the letter is not just the adjuster, but the client--who may appreciate more intense rhetoric or &quot;fist-pounding&quot;.  It doesn&#039;t persuade the adjuster, however.  What does is  a clear chronologically laid out account of the injuries sustained and the impact on the claimant&#039;s life.  Exaggerated, sappy anecdotes don&#039;t.  

The examples on Miller&#039;s website are pretty good--assuming they are backed up with objective, corroborating support.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having reviewed maybe up to a thousand of these &#8220;demand packages&#8221; over the years, I have grown tired of the threatening tone taken in many of the demands.  However, the audience of the letter is not just the adjuster, but the client&#8211;who may appreciate more intense rhetoric or &#8220;fist-pounding&#8221;.  It doesn&#8217;t persuade the adjuster, however.  What does is  a clear chronologically laid out account of the injuries sustained and the impact on the claimant&#8217;s life.  Exaggerated, sappy anecdotes don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>The examples on Miller&#8217;s website are pretty good&#8211;assuming they are backed up with objective, corroborating support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
