<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Banning discrimination against the unemployed?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/banning-discrimination-against-the-unemployed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/banning-discrimination-against-the-unemployed/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Supposed hiring bias against unemployed applicants		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/banning-discrimination-against-the-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-128142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supposed hiring bias against unemployed applicants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24864#comment-128142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the claims of unemployment discrimination are overblown.&#8221; [Fox News; Iain Murray; earlier here, here, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the claims of unemployment discrimination are overblown.&#8221; [Fox News; Iain Murray; earlier here, here, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GregS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/banning-discrimination-against-the-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-126935</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GregS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24864#comment-126935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Banning discrimination against the unemployed is a terrible idea. The United States has very high unemployment, and Washington&#039;s answer to this is to increase the legal risks of hiring new employees? Insanity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banning discrimination against the unemployed is a terrible idea. The United States has very high unemployment, and Washington&#8217;s answer to this is to increase the legal risks of hiring new employees? Insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Alexander		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/banning-discrimination-against-the-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-126834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Alexander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24864#comment-126834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;In other words in good economic times it would be impossible for a company that wanted to increase its profits to not hire the currently unemployed.&quot;

No, in good economic times it would be impossible for ALL companies to hire only the currently employed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In other words in good economic times it would be impossible for a company that wanted to increase its profits to not hire the currently unemployed.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, in good economic times it would be impossible for ALL companies to hire only the currently employed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/banning-discrimination-against-the-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-126826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24864#comment-126826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At the risk of stating the obvious (to everyone but Democrats in Congress), if companies only hired people who currently have jobs then the cost of labor would spiral upwards since the same people would be hired over an over again for more money than they were currently making. Also, if only employed people were hired, an industry would not be able to respond to increase demand since no additional people could be hired. Yes companies could hire new graduates, but new graduates would not be able to meet the need for experienced people. In other words in good economic times it would be impossible for a company that wanted to increase its profits to not hire the currently unemployed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of stating the obvious (to everyone but Democrats in Congress), if companies only hired people who currently have jobs then the cost of labor would spiral upwards since the same people would be hired over an over again for more money than they were currently making. Also, if only employed people were hired, an industry would not be able to respond to increase demand since no additional people could be hired. Yes companies could hire new graduates, but new graduates would not be able to meet the need for experienced people. In other words in good economic times it would be impossible for a company that wanted to increase its profits to not hire the currently unemployed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
