<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Constitutional law roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/constitutional-law-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/constitutional-law-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/constitutional-law-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-126515</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24766#comment-126515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Peter&gt; Cato does not give legal advice or assist in individuals&#039; legal situations. Its amicus program contributes briefs in federal appellate cases in hopes of influencing the development of sound legal principle.  For helpful advice on a local land taking issue, you might want to approach a local pro-property-rights legal center such as the New England Legal Foundation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter> Cato does not give legal advice or assist in individuals&#8217; legal situations. Its amicus program contributes briefs in federal appellate cases in hopes of influencing the development of sound legal principle.  For helpful advice on a local land taking issue, you might want to approach a local pro-property-rights legal center such as the New England Legal Foundation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/constitutional-law-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-126503</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24766#comment-126503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am faced with similar exhaustion of remedies case in Massachusetts where the state expects me to agree to permanently protect 2/3&#039;s of my land to get a &quot;permit&quot; to use the other third.  Is this just a case of the state allowed to extort the landowner or is it a taking?  How can I get advice from CATO on how to proceed since I am at the very beginning of this process?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am faced with similar exhaustion of remedies case in Massachusetts where the state expects me to agree to permanently protect 2/3&#8217;s of my land to get a &#8220;permit&#8221; to use the other third.  Is this just a case of the state allowed to extort the landowner or is it a taking?  How can I get advice from CATO on how to proceed since I am at the very beginning of this process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/09/constitutional-law-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-126480</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24766#comment-126480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From what I understand, the Bible study group in question regularly had more than 50 people. I can see that being a problem.

I think their ordinance is too strict though because it technically would limit groups much smaller, even if it&#039;s not regularly enforced for smaller groups.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, the Bible study group in question regularly had more than 50 people. I can see that being a problem.</p>
<p>I think their ordinance is too strict though because it technically would limit groups much smaller, even if it&#8217;s not regularly enforced for smaller groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
