Comments on: Californians can’t get Dunkin’ Donuts coffee online

By: mojo

mojo — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:27:35 +0000

D: no.

I advocate voting “no” on all initiatives, unless presented with solid and compelling reasons for sticking things into the already heavily overburdened CA constitution.

And, for the record, I haven’t voted “yes” on a proposition in the last 20 years.

By: D

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:12:28 +0000

mojo, do you advocate that the initiative process be abrogated? Are initiatives worse than what the legislatures come up with? Possibly you could propose a method whereby the only bills/initiatives introduced are far-sighted, brilliant, and agreed upon by everyone. In the meantime I’ve been training my pigs to perform aerial maneuvers. It is going better than teaching my children to consider the consequences before they act.

By: DensityDuck

DensityDuck — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:10:40 +0000

Let’s hope these people don’t get ahold of the ACSH’s Holiday Dinner Menu: http://www.acsh.org/publications/pubID.1743/pub_detail.asp

They could make it illegal for Californians to eat food!

By: John Burgess

John Burgess — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:06:58 +0000

Really, companies should just stop doing business in California until it changes its anti-business laws. Two or three years without most consumer products should lead even the donkeys in that state to some level of awareness.

I realize that CA is a huge market for almost everything. But bottom line losses in the short term must be better than guaranteed mega-losses in the long term.

By: mojo

mojo — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:55:30 +0000

Yes, another brilliant result of the initiative process.