<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wisconsin considers curbing &#8220;one-way&#8221; attorney fees	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/11/wisconsin-considers-curbing-one-way-attorney-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/11/wisconsin-considers-curbing-one-way-attorney-fees/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: wfjag		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/11/wisconsin-considers-curbing-one-way-attorney-fees/comment-page-1/#comment-129017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wfjag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25526#comment-129017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now, maybe Congress should look at doing the same for 42 USC 1988.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, maybe Congress should look at doing the same for 42 USC 1988.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/11/wisconsin-considers-curbing-one-way-attorney-fees/comment-page-1/#comment-128999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25526#comment-128999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ideally, the USSC would have ruled a long time ago that one-way attorney fees were a violation of the &quot;equal protection of the laws,&quot; but the current unfair system is now deeply embedded in &quot;stare decisis.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, the USSC would have ruled a long time ago that one-way attorney fees were a violation of the &#8220;equal protection of the laws,&#8221; but the current unfair system is now deeply embedded in &#8220;stare decisis.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: doug		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/11/wisconsin-considers-curbing-one-way-attorney-fees/comment-page-1/#comment-128994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25526#comment-128994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[awesome.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
