Comments on: Don’t

By: CJohn

CJohn — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:55:55 +0000

This reminds me of the wonderful observation someone made about Rakofsky in his “Internet mobbing” case:
“The motion is a freakish mess, of a quality I would normally associate with mid-range pro se work — not as bad as a homeless psychotic pro se, but not as good as a reasonably articulate and experienced pro se, like a tax protester or something.”

By: doug

doug — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:52:29 +0000

or, i bet that the defendent and her attorney are just ill behaved and think the world should revolve around themselves. Both should be disciplined and disbarred.

By: Walter Olson

Walter Olson — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:24:03 +0000

Per national news coverage, the judge targeted for the brunt of the insults says she isn’t of the Catholic faith at all, which may be a clue as to the “accuracy” quotient.

By: Le Mur

Le Mur — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:13:15 +0000

I bet the statements are stuck a nerve because of their accuracy and the stupid sleazy judges are just using it as an easier-than-average excuse to not be impartial.