<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Food and agriculture roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/12/food-and-agriculture-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/12/food-and-agriculture-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:26:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Labor law roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/12/food-and-agriculture-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-138171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labor law roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26088#comment-138171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] More on outcry over proposed federal restrictions on kids&#8217; farm chores [WSJ, NPR, Gannett Wisconsin, earlier] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More on outcry over proposed federal restrictions on kids&#8217; farm chores [WSJ, NPR, Gannett Wisconsin, earlier] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gitarcarver		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/12/food-and-agriculture-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-137713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gitarcarver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26088#comment-137713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RE: Caveat Venditor, it seems as if the woman in the video wants all the benefits of a commercial license without paying the licensing fee.  

$400 for two years is not unreasonable.  She talks about a ceiling in what she can do, but really there isn&#039;t.  The licensing regulation is limiting her - she is.

The woman just feels she is special and not have to pay the same fees as other businesses.  That is fine.  I would rather the other businesses not have to pay the fees rather than carve out a special niche for her.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Caveat Venditor, it seems as if the woman in the video wants all the benefits of a commercial license without paying the licensing fee.  </p>
<p>$400 for two years is not unreasonable.  She talks about a ceiling in what she can do, but really there isn&#8217;t.  The licensing regulation is limiting her &#8211; she is.</p>
<p>The woman just feels she is special and not have to pay the same fees as other businesses.  That is fine.  I would rather the other businesses not have to pay the fees rather than carve out a special niche for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Hoey		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/12/food-and-agriculture-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-137682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hoey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26088#comment-137682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am glad to see McDonald&#039;s response to the San Francisco&#039;s nanny state law against Happy Meals is working. What is missing is the back story-McDonald&#039;s has been at odds with the city fathers there for decades, which has a past history of a ban against fast food restaurants, not because they were unhealthy, but because they were and are nonunion, a sin in that ultra liberal city by the Bay.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to see McDonald&#8217;s response to the San Francisco&#8217;s nanny state law against Happy Meals is working. What is missing is the back story-McDonald&#8217;s has been at odds with the city fathers there for decades, which has a past history of a ban against fast food restaurants, not because they were unhealthy, but because they were and are nonunion, a sin in that ultra liberal city by the Bay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
