<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Defining who&#8217;s disabled	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/defining-whos-disabled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/defining-whos-disabled/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: ps		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/defining-whos-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-140808</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26948#comment-140808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[lets declare everyone disabled. That way we&#039;d all be equal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets declare everyone disabled. That way we&#8217;d all be equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: boblipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/defining-whos-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-140804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boblipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26948#comment-140804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lawmakers will not define &quot;disabled.&quot;  Defining &quot;disabled&quot;  will put them on the hook for the details of that definition.  By refusing to define it, they can take responsibility to the groups who benefit from the current definition and avoid blame for overreaching or underreaching by blaming &quot;bureaucrats.&quot;

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawmakers will not define &#8220;disabled.&#8221;  Defining &#8220;disabled&#8221;  will put them on the hook for the details of that definition.  By refusing to define it, they can take responsibility to the groups who benefit from the current definition and avoid blame for overreaching or underreaching by blaming &#8220;bureaucrats.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
