Comments on: Joyce copyright expires

By: Bill Poser

Bill Poser — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:12:09 +0000

One would hope that the awful history of the Joyce estate would be a lesson to advocates of ridiculously long terms of copyright. None of this nonsense served in any way to encourage Joyce to write or to provide him with sustenance. It didn’t even do much to provide financially for his heirs. The only change in copyright law that would have been of any benefit to him is the requirement, now eliminated, of registration.

By: JWB

JWB — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:11:45 +0000

https://joycefoundation.osu.edu/joyce-copyright/fair-use-and-permissions/about-law/public-domain gives details on when different Joyce works will (or may – there are potential legal and/or factual disputes relevant to some of them) pass into the public domain in the U.S. Dubliners/Portrait of an Artist/other early stuff have long been public domain in the U.S. but are now also public domain in the U.K./Ireland and throughout the E.U.

By: Hugo S. Cunningham

Hugo S. Cunningham — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:24:38 +0000

Stanford Law’s Fair Use Project played a heroic role defeating one of Stephen Joyce’s most unreasonable claims in 2005. Someone should present FUP with an equestrian statue of author James Joyce; the rear of the steed could bear a recognizable resemblance to the litigious grandson. It could be an entirely web-based representation of an imaginary statue.

By: Hugo S. Cunningham

Hugo S. Cunningham — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:17:59 +0000

James Joyce died (per Wikipedia) on 13 Jan 1941. Current US law also is based on 70 years after the author’s death, but I am not sure whether the operative day is 1 Jan, 13 Jan, 14 Jan, 31 Dec., or something else.

By: CTrees

CTrees — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:56:41 +0000

The copyrights to all of his works are still valid in the US, correct?