<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Posited &#8220;right to be forgotten online&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/posited-right-to-be-forgotten-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/posited-right-to-be-forgotten-online/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/posited-right-to-be-forgotten-online/comment-page-1/#comment-141406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27215#comment-141406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two of the least appealing claimants of a European &quot;right to be forgotten&quot; include a German murderer suing Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Werl%C3%A9_and_Manfred_Lauber
and a Spanish plastic surgeon who worries about a 20-year-old unfavorable newspaper article, suing Google but *not* the newspaper:
http://searchengineland.com/google-confronting-spains-right-to-be-forgotten-67440

As a compromise on Google, I suggest a &quot;right-of-reply&quot; link that would be displayed together with the link someone doesn&#039;t like.  On his right-of-reply page, for example, the Spanish plastic surgeon could point out that the newpaper article is 20 years old and that in more recent times he enjoys a excellent reputation.  (Or he could dispute the accuracy of the article itself.)   A single right-of-reply page would suffice for all the charges and links the author wishes to answer. 

I have more sympathy for a &quot;right to be forgotten&quot; in straightforward &quot;invasion of privacy&quot; cases, but share skepticism that it can be made workable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two of the least appealing claimants of a European &#8220;right to be forgotten&#8221; include a German murderer suing Wikipedia<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Werl%C3%A9_and_Manfred_Lauber" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Werl%C3%A9_and_Manfred_Lauber</a><br />
and a Spanish plastic surgeon who worries about a 20-year-old unfavorable newspaper article, suing Google but *not* the newspaper:<br />
<a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-confronting-spains-right-to-be-forgotten-67440" rel="nofollow ugc">http://searchengineland.com/google-confronting-spains-right-to-be-forgotten-67440</a></p>
<p>As a compromise on Google, I suggest a &#8220;right-of-reply&#8221; link that would be displayed together with the link someone doesn&#8217;t like.  On his right-of-reply page, for example, the Spanish plastic surgeon could point out that the newpaper article is 20 years old and that in more recent times he enjoys a excellent reputation.  (Or he could dispute the accuracy of the article itself.)   A single right-of-reply page would suffice for all the charges and links the author wishes to answer. </p>
<p>I have more sympathy for a &#8220;right to be forgotten&#8221; in straightforward &#8220;invasion of privacy&#8221; cases, but share skepticism that it can be made workable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/posited-right-to-be-forgotten-online/comment-page-1/#comment-141380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27215#comment-141380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;When the European Commission can&#039;t clean up the outlier colonies like the United States and the island of criminals...&lt;/I&gt;

Comedy gold]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When the European Commission can&#8217;t clean up the outlier colonies like the United States and the island of criminals&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Comedy gold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
