<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;The saddest trademark case of 2011&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/the-saddest-trademark-case-of-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/the-saddest-trademark-case-of-2011/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Swirsky		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/the-saddest-trademark-case-of-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-140406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Swirsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=26664#comment-140406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting case. It&#039;s hard to feel sorry for _anyone_ going after Comcast, no matter how flimsy their case is. (I just spent two weeks with Comcast trying to get them to fix my home Internet service which goes up and down intermittently!) I&#039;m wondering if Fancaster thought they can use the fact that &quot;everybody hates Comcast&quot; to their advantage.

My company has two registered trademarks and we&#039;re constantly searching new applications, and an automated weekly Google search, to see if anyone is using the mark or a variant. This way we can know quickly if someone starts to use it, or file an objection to an application.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting case. It&#8217;s hard to feel sorry for _anyone_ going after Comcast, no matter how flimsy their case is. (I just spent two weeks with Comcast trying to get them to fix my home Internet service which goes up and down intermittently!) I&#8217;m wondering if Fancaster thought they can use the fact that &#8220;everybody hates Comcast&#8221; to their advantage.</p>
<p>My company has two registered trademarks and we&#8217;re constantly searching new applications, and an automated weekly Google search, to see if anyone is using the mark or a variant. This way we can know quickly if someone starts to use it, or file an objection to an application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
