<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Indian court forces Facebook, Google to censor content&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/indian-court-forces-facebook-google-to-censor-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/indian-court-forces-facebook-google-to-censor-content/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/indian-court-forces-facebook-google-to-censor-content/comment-page-1/#comment-142180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27549#comment-142180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The providers could allow users to download an app that would block all graphics, as well as articles containing blacklisted words of potential religious controversy (&quot;Muhammad&quot;, &quot;Jesus&quot;, etc.).  The app could point to a single government approved and controlled site where approved articles mentioning religion could be seen, as well as graphics.

Let individual users themselves decide whether they want to use this app.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The providers could allow users to download an app that would block all graphics, as well as articles containing blacklisted words of potential religious controversy (&#8220;Muhammad&#8221;, &#8220;Jesus&#8221;, etc.).  The app could point to a single government approved and controlled site where approved articles mentioning religion could be seen, as well as graphics.</p>
<p>Let individual users themselves decide whether they want to use this app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/indian-court-forces-facebook-google-to-censor-content/comment-page-1/#comment-142129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27549#comment-142129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In India, Google and Facebook can hire censors cheaply.   But will they face ruinous US-style financial losses if some plaintiff claims to be mortally offended by something a censor overlooked?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In India, Google and Facebook can hire censors cheaply.   But will they face ruinous US-style financial losses if some plaintiff claims to be mortally offended by something a censor overlooked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
