<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;The most plausible route to the death of football&#8230;&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-most-plausible-route-to-the-death-of-football/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-most-plausible-route-to-the-death-of-football/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Schwartz		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-most-plausible-route-to-the-death-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-142121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27543#comment-142121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, liability suits messing with professional Football in the United States may be the most plausible route to tort reform.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, liability suits messing with professional Football in the United States may be the most plausible route to tort reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Melvin H.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-most-plausible-route-to-the-death-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-142114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melvin H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27543#comment-142114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Or, let the insanity known as Title IX take over high-school sports.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, let the insanity known as Title IX take over high-school sports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Melvin H.		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-most-plausible-route-to-the-death-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-142076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melvin H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27543#comment-142076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On top of that, if this somehow gets through, how long before players from the NBA, NHL, MLB, soccer, auto racing, and wrestling (both amateur and WWE/TNA style)--along with who knows how many other sports--would haul the leagues (and others) in under the same premise?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On top of that, if this somehow gets through, how long before players from the NBA, NHL, MLB, soccer, auto racing, and wrestling (both amateur and WWE/TNA style)&#8211;along with who knows how many other sports&#8211;would haul the leagues (and others) in under the same premise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DEM		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/02/the-most-plausible-route-to-the-death-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-142063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DEM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=27543#comment-142063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Other than through a transparently results-oriented and football-hostile judge, how would such a suit get past an assumption of the risk defense?  Football is a dangerous sport and everyone knows it.  Is it even possible for a plaintiff to establish that he (or his family) understood that a football helmet would prevent all concussions?  They plainly do not do so, have never have done so, and probably never will do so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than through a transparently results-oriented and football-hostile judge, how would such a suit get past an assumption of the risk defense?  Football is a dangerous sport and everyone knows it.  Is it even possible for a plaintiff to establish that he (or his family) understood that a football helmet would prevent all concussions?  They plainly do not do so, have never have done so, and probably never will do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
