Comments on: “It’s just bad public policy to allow unfettered access to all kinds of food.”

By: Bill Alexander

Bill Alexander — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:02:08 +0000

A Ho-Ho is much harder to keep lit.

By: antiredistributionist

antiredistributionist — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:54:24 +0000

Absolutely right, gitarcarver.

By: Ron Miler

Ron Miler — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:04:16 +0000

I think a lot of you are outraged by this because it reminds you of something that annoys you. Arguably, this is a bad way to make public policy. Why don’t we start putting tariffs on Taiwan because they remind us of Chinese unfair trade practices?

We are talking food stamps here, right? Should it be for food that actually helps the body or at least is not known to hurt? You are taking our money to buy food. I don’t have a problem with telling them how they ought to spend it. In this context, how much different is a Ho-Ho from a cigarette?

By: marco73

marco73 — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:05:45 +0000

Interesting that Ronda Storms, Florida State Senator from the Tampa area, is quoted in the artical concerning what Food Stamp recipients should be able to purchase. Amazingly, there is always a boogie man somewhere threatening our children (porn, strip clubs, gays, corn-based sugar) just about election time. You don’t need to buy a calendar, just wait for Ronda to jump in front of a camera.

By: rxc

rxc — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:56:57 +0000

“The basis of their diet is white bread and margarine, corned beef, sugared tea and potato—an appalling diet. Would it not be better if they spent more money on wholesome things like oranges and wholemeal bread?…Yes it would, but the point is, no human being would ever do such a thing.…A millionaire may enjoy breakfasting off orange juice and Ryvita biscuits; an unemployed man does not…When you are underfed, harassed, bored, and miserable, you don’t want to eat dull wholesome food. You want to eat something a little bit tasty.”

George Orwell

By: gitarcarver

gitarcarver — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:41:16 +0000

Jim,

Here is a link to the bill:

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2012/1658/BillText/c1/HTML

The applicable section states:

(a)?Add to the list of items that may not be purchased with
70 federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds
71 nonstaple, unhealthy foods. Such prohibited items include, but
72 are not limited to, foods containing trans fats; sweetened
73 beverages, including sodas; sweets, such as jello, candy, ice
74 cream, pudding, popsicles, muffins, sweet rolls, cakes,
75 cupcakes, pies, cobblers, pastries, and doughnuts; and salty
76 snack foods, such as corn-based salty snacks, pretzels, party
77 mix, popcorn, and potato chips.

By: Jim Collins

Jim Collins — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:47:10 +0000

I’ll reserve judgement until I see a list of what qualifies as a “junk food”. I’ll bet it is more than Oreos and Mountain Dew.

By: Nezuji

Nezuji — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:32:44 +0000

Can someone explain to me how two people have already taken what seems to me to be a very conservative idea (limit what people sucking on the tax-payers’ teat are allowed to spend that money on), and turn it into “another example of liberalism gone wild”?

By: gitarcarver

gitarcarver — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:34:02 +0000

Sorry, but it is bad “public policy to allow unfettered access to all kinds of food” when the public is paying for it and the person is using food stamps to buy the junk food. That is what the discussion is about. It is not about sugar, or calories or anything other than whether the public should pay for and finance the purchase of junk food by those on food stamps.

Here is Storms’ quote within context:

“It’s just bad public policy to allow unfettered access to all kinds of food,” she told me over the phone. “Why should we cut all of these programs and continue to pay for people to use food stamps to buy potato chips, Oreos and Mountain Dew? The goal is to feed good food to hungry people.”

Source: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/regulating-our-sugar-habit/

In related news, a bill in the Florida Legislature this year would have prevented the use of government welfare EBT cards to be used in strip clubs or casinos. Think about that for a moment.

The measure failed.

By: John Burgess

John Burgess — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:26:28 +0000

To take Ed’s idea further, how about ensuring that the pols who would police our food do not get tables — ever — at Momfuku, Masa, Serendipity, Per Se, and the like. City Council members and the Mayor can only eat at the local tofu bars.