<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Reassignment as reasonable accommodation: mandatory or not?&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/03/reassignment-as-reasonable-accommodation-mandatory-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/03/reassignment-as-reasonable-accommodation-mandatory-or-not/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Schwartz		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/03/reassignment-as-reasonable-accommodation-mandatory-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-146402</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=28504#comment-146402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Didn&#039;t the Supreme Court resolve this issue in US Airways v. Barnett? Addressing the question whether bypassing their normal seniority system to give a disabled person a job they could accomplish, the Supreme Court held: &quot;The statute does not require proof on a case-by-case basis that a seniority system should prevail. That is because it would not be reasonable in the run of cases that the assignment in question trump the rules of a seniority system. To the contrary, it will ordinarily be unreasonable for the assignment to prevail.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the Supreme Court resolve this issue in US Airways v. Barnett? Addressing the question whether bypassing their normal seniority system to give a disabled person a job they could accomplish, the Supreme Court held: &#8220;The statute does not require proof on a case-by-case basis that a seniority system should prevail. That is because it would not be reasonable in the run of cases that the assignment in question trump the rules of a seniority system. To the contrary, it will ordinarily be unreasonable for the assignment to prevail.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: boblipton		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/03/reassignment-as-reasonable-accommodation-mandatory-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-146383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boblipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=28504#comment-146383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am no longer suited to clean urinals.  I request an immediate appointment as Chief Compliance Officer.

Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am no longer suited to clean urinals.  I request an immediate appointment as Chief Compliance Officer.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Hoey		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/03/reassignment-as-reasonable-accommodation-mandatory-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-146376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hoey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=28504#comment-146376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yet another conundrum created by a poorly drafted otherwise altruistic law. I tried to point out these issues when it was being drafted, but my arguments fell upon hearing impaired ears.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another conundrum created by a poorly drafted otherwise altruistic law. I tried to point out these issues when it was being drafted, but my arguments fell upon hearing impaired ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
