<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: April 23 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/april-23-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/april-23-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: April 30 roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/april-23-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-153939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[April 30 roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29171#comment-153939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;starkly ideological&#8221; judging of this sort, except of course when she favors it [Root, earlier] And David Bernstein again corrects some Left commentators regarding the standing of child labor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;starkly ideological&#8221; judging of this sort, except of course when she favors it [Root, earlier] And David Bernstein again corrects some Left commentators regarding the standing of child labor [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wfjag		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/april-23-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-151893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wfjag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29171#comment-151893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RE: suiting The Bachelor” TV franchise:  Takeaway statement from the Inside TV article linked to in the legal blog:

&quot;On a less serious note, [Plaintiffs’ co-counsel] Perkins noted that still single [Pllaintiffs] Claybrooks and Johnson are already fielding heavy interests beyond their news value, joking, &#039;We’ve already had calls from people who want to interview them over dinner tonight.&#039;”

See article: &quot;Men suing &#039;The Bachelor&#039; discuss their case&quot;, by Lanford Beard, (Apr. 18, 2012)

Litigation as the new pick-up technique.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: suiting The Bachelor” TV franchise:  Takeaway statement from the Inside TV article linked to in the legal blog:</p>
<p>&#8220;On a less serious note, [Plaintiffs’ co-counsel] Perkins noted that still single [Pllaintiffs] Claybrooks and Johnson are already fielding heavy interests beyond their news value, joking, &#8216;We’ve already had calls from people who want to interview them over dinner tonight.&#8217;”</p>
<p>See article: &#8220;Men suing &#8216;The Bachelor&#8217; discuss their case&#8221;, by Lanford Beard, (Apr. 18, 2012)</p>
<p>Litigation as the new pick-up technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
