<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lilly Ledbetter back in news	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/lilly-ledbetter-back-in-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/lilly-ledbetter-back-in-news/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hans Bader		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/lilly-ledbetter-back-in-news/comment-page-1/#comment-149930</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans Bader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=28897#comment-149930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link!  It doesn&#039;t surprise me that Romney has taken the same position as Obama on this particular law, the 2009 Ledbetter Act.  The Ledbetter Act is already law, and there&#039;s no chance of it being repealed, anyway, so I am not surprised that Romney didn&#039;t want to burn any political capital on an exercise in futility.

The more important question for me is whether Romney will oppose another bill, the misleadingly-named Paycheck Fairness Act, which is much worse than the Ledbetter Act (President Obama unfortunately supports the Paycheck Fairness Act, which economists like Diana Furchtgott-Roth have criticized as costly, unfair, and deceptive), but which has not yet become law.  Even some moderate Democrats and Republicans who voted for the Ledbetter Act (like Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho)) opposed the Paycheck Fairness Act, viewing it as a substantially worse bill.

To date, Romney has not endorsed the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would undermine merit-based pay practices.  I hope he does not, since the Paycheck Fairness Act is far from guaranteed to pass (it has only passed the House in the past, when the House was in Democratic hands -- not under its current GOP majority).

I explain why the Paycheck Fairness Act is a bad idea here:

http://www.examiner.com/scotus-in-washington-dc/paycheck-fairness-act-would-mandate-equal-pay-for-unequal-work-triggering-flood-of-lawsuits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!  It doesn&#8217;t surprise me that Romney has taken the same position as Obama on this particular law, the 2009 Ledbetter Act.  The Ledbetter Act is already law, and there&#8217;s no chance of it being repealed, anyway, so I am not surprised that Romney didn&#8217;t want to burn any political capital on an exercise in futility.</p>
<p>The more important question for me is whether Romney will oppose another bill, the misleadingly-named Paycheck Fairness Act, which is much worse than the Ledbetter Act (President Obama unfortunately supports the Paycheck Fairness Act, which economists like Diana Furchtgott-Roth have criticized as costly, unfair, and deceptive), but which has not yet become law.  Even some moderate Democrats and Republicans who voted for the Ledbetter Act (like Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho)) opposed the Paycheck Fairness Act, viewing it as a substantially worse bill.</p>
<p>To date, Romney has not endorsed the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would undermine merit-based pay practices.  I hope he does not, since the Paycheck Fairness Act is far from guaranteed to pass (it has only passed the House in the past, when the House was in Democratic hands &#8212; not under its current GOP majority).</p>
<p>I explain why the Paycheck Fairness Act is a bad idea here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/scotus-in-washington-dc/paycheck-fairness-act-would-mandate-equal-pay-for-unequal-work-triggering-flood-of-lawsuits" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.examiner.com/scotus-in-washington-dc/paycheck-fairness-act-would-mandate-equal-pay-for-unequal-work-triggering-flood-of-lawsuits</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/04/lilly-ledbetter-back-in-news/comment-page-1/#comment-149892</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=28897#comment-149892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Lilly Ledbetter Act, job creation, and inequality...&lt;/strong&gt;

Before the Lilly Ledbetter Act was passed, there were already federal laws on the books prohibiting sex discrimination in pay. The only thing the Ledbetter Act does is make it easier for employees to bring bogus fair-pay claims accusing long-gone......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lilly Ledbetter Act, job creation, and inequality&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Before the Lilly Ledbetter Act was passed, there were already federal laws on the books prohibiting sex discrimination in pay. The only thing the Ledbetter Act does is make it easier for employees to bring bogus fair-pay claims accusing long-gone&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
