<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Feet hurt from &#8220;repetitive walking?&#8221; Claim compensation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/feet-hurt-from-repetitive-walking-claim-compensation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/feet-hurt-from-repetitive-walking-claim-compensation/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 16:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Attorney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/feet-hurt-from-repetitive-walking-claim-compensation/comment-page-1/#comment-160067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Attorney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 16:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30147#comment-160067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When I did worker&#039;s comp in Virginia, &quot;repetitive&quot; wasn&#039;t &quot;compensable&quot;, i.e., something you could get paid for.  So claimants just invented a sudden pop or sudden pull that they could then overlay on an otherwise-repetitive injury like sore back or shoulder.  I always imagined the lawyer-client meeting went like this:

&quot;I got hurt at work.  I just used my back so much it started to hurt.&#039;

&quot;Well, you know, you can&#039;t get paid for that.  The law only allows payment if there&#039;s a sudden injury.  So let me ask you.  Was there a sudden injury?&quot;

&quot;Oh, yeah.  I guess there was.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I did worker&#8217;s comp in Virginia, &#8220;repetitive&#8221; wasn&#8217;t &#8220;compensable&#8221;, i.e., something you could get paid for.  So claimants just invented a sudden pop or sudden pull that they could then overlay on an otherwise-repetitive injury like sore back or shoulder.  I always imagined the lawyer-client meeting went like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;I got hurt at work.  I just used my back so much it started to hurt.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, you know, you can&#8217;t get paid for that.  The law only allows payment if there&#8217;s a sudden injury.  So let me ask you.  Was there a sudden injury?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, yeah.  I guess there was.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LTMG		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/feet-hurt-from-repetitive-walking-claim-compensation/comment-page-1/#comment-160048</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LTMG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30147#comment-160048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s next?  Repetitive sitting?  Repetitive leaning on a shovel?  Repetitive socializing during work hours?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s next?  Repetitive sitting?  Repetitive leaning on a shovel?  Repetitive socializing during work hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
