https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/labor-and-employment-law-roundup-7/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Thu, 24 May 2012 20:06:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/labor-and-employment-law-roundup-7/comment-page-1/#comment-158925 Thu, 24 May 2012 20:06:06 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=29661#comment-158925 Thanks for the original information and the link back. You’re the best.

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/labor-and-employment-law-roundup-7/comment-page-1/#comment-158922 Thu, 24 May 2012 19:59:45 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=29661#comment-158922 According to Bainbridge, ending racial discrimination is important enough to justify eroding employment at will – but rights deemed so crucial that they are expressly mentioned in the Constitution aren’t. Nonsense.

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/labor-and-employment-law-roundup-7/comment-page-1/#comment-158861 Thu, 24 May 2012 13:06:45 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=29661#comment-158861 I have to respectfully disagree with the Bainbridge article. My vehicle is an extension of my property rights. If I keep my vehicle secure it is none of my employer’s business what I have in it as long as it is legal. When my employer is willing to accept full responsibility for my safety during my trip to and from work, then I will accept a rule like the one mentioned.

]]>