<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Lawyers Intentionally Inflicting Emotional Distress&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/lawyers-intentionally-inflicting-emotional-distress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/lawyers-intentionally-inflicting-emotional-distress/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Max Kennerly		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/lawyers-intentionally-inflicting-emotional-distress/comment-page-1/#comment-159755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennerly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29891#comment-159755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[IIED is a claim by, for, and of lawyers. The 99% can&#039;t afford a lawyer to file an IIED claim, and contingent fee lawyers like me won&#039;t touch them because they never succeed and there&#039;s no insurance coverage, but if you&#039;re a lawyer or you&#039;re in the 1%, then you can bring an IIED claim because the cost/benefit proposition is irrelevant to you.

I can&#039;t imagine anything worse than adding IIED claims to lawyer&#039;s conduct. You know what happens then? After every case is resolved, an inevitable IIED follow-up lawsuit is filed, so that every soft-tissue-injury car accident case turns into Jarndyce v. Jarndyce. Can you even imagine what would happen to family law? It&#039;s already hard enough to get real closure in family law cases; add in a post hoc civil claim and you&#039;ll never, ever see the end of custody or alimony cases, it&#039;ll just be IIED claim followed by IIED-claims-for-the-prior-IIED-claims, ad nauseum.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIED is a claim by, for, and of lawyers. The 99% can&#8217;t afford a lawyer to file an IIED claim, and contingent fee lawyers like me won&#8217;t touch them because they never succeed and there&#8217;s no insurance coverage, but if you&#8217;re a lawyer or you&#8217;re in the 1%, then you can bring an IIED claim because the cost/benefit proposition is irrelevant to you.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine anything worse than adding IIED claims to lawyer&#8217;s conduct. You know what happens then? After every case is resolved, an inevitable IIED follow-up lawsuit is filed, so that every soft-tissue-injury car accident case turns into Jarndyce v. Jarndyce. Can you even imagine what would happen to family law? It&#8217;s already hard enough to get real closure in family law cases; add in a post hoc civil claim and you&#8217;ll never, ever see the end of custody or alimony cases, it&#8217;ll just be IIED claim followed by IIED-claims-for-the-prior-IIED-claims, ad nauseum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: L Nettles		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/lawyers-intentionally-inflicting-emotional-distress/comment-page-1/#comment-158555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L Nettles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29891#comment-158555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I once defended a malicious prosecution case brought by 2 lawyers against a doctor.  The lawyers alleged they suffered emotional distress when they were served with the suit that was the foundation of the malicious prosecution claim.  I imagined the jury falling out of their chair laughing.  The case never got that far. 

(Doctor sued for malpractice by lawyers on behalf of client.  Malpractice case dismissed on summary judgment.  Doctor sues lawyers.  Appeals Court rules only client can be sued for malicious prosecution,  not lawyers and dismissed Doctor&#039;s suit, then lawyers sue doctor)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once defended a malicious prosecution case brought by 2 lawyers against a doctor.  The lawyers alleged they suffered emotional distress when they were served with the suit that was the foundation of the malicious prosecution claim.  I imagined the jury falling out of their chair laughing.  The case never got that far. </p>
<p>(Doctor sued for malpractice by lawyers on behalf of client.  Malpractice case dismissed on summary judgment.  Doctor sues lawyers.  Appeals Court rules only client can be sued for malicious prosecution,  not lawyers and dismissed Doctor&#8217;s suit, then lawyers sue doctor)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
