<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Maryland appeals court: all pit bulls dangerous	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/maryland-appeals-court-all-pit-bulls-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/maryland-appeals-court-all-pit-bulls-dangerous/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Miller		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/maryland-appeals-court-all-pit-bulls-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-156101</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29521#comment-156101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Walter, I analyzed this opinion here: 

http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/04/strict_liability_for_pit_bulls_1.html

As you will see from the comments, there are some strong opinions on both sides of this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, I analyzed this opinion here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/04/strict_liability_for_pit_bulls_1.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2012/04/strict_liability_for_pit_bulls_1.html</a></p>
<p>As you will see from the comments, there are some strong opinions on both sides of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hans		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/05/maryland-appeals-court-all-pit-bulls-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-156052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29521#comment-156052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And yet, the Tenth Circuit held that it likely violated equal protection to have an anti-pitbull ordinance, as I recall.

Neither of these rulings makes sense to me.  If localities want to legislatively ban pit bulls, that is not unconstitutional (regardless of whether it is overkill).  But if they don&#039;t, judges shouldn&#039;t make up de facto common law prohibitions against them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet, the Tenth Circuit held that it likely violated equal protection to have an anti-pitbull ordinance, as I recall.</p>
<p>Neither of these rulings makes sense to me.  If localities want to legislatively ban pit bulls, that is not unconstitutional (regardless of whether it is overkill).  But if they don&#8217;t, judges shouldn&#8217;t make up de facto common law prohibitions against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
