<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Judge Easterbrook vs. the attitudinal model	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/06/judge-easterbrook-vs-the-attitudinal-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/06/judge-easterbrook-vs-the-attitudinal-model/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Supreme Court Issues 5-to-4 Rulings, But Not On Obamacare		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/06/judge-easterbrook-vs-the-attitudinal-model/comment-page-1/#comment-163462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues 5-to-4 Rulings, But Not On Obamacare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30224#comment-163462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] justices joined the majority opinion. That, too, is unremarkable, as I explain here, and Point of Law explained earlier at this link, contrary to the false conventional wisdom that depicts 5-to-4 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] justices joined the majority opinion. That, too, is unremarkable, as I explain here, and Point of Law explained earlier at this link, contrary to the false conventional wisdom that depicts 5-to-4 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Miller		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/06/judge-easterbrook-vs-the-attitudinal-model/comment-page-1/#comment-160908</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30224#comment-160908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt this is true.  But the difference might be you would not see the split across ideological lines that you see now.   I find 5-4 decisions that fall neatly along party lines to be quite depressing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt this is true.  But the difference might be you would not see the split across ideological lines that you see now.   I find 5-4 decisions that fall neatly along party lines to be quite depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
