<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Police drones in the sky, cont&#8217;d	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/police-drones-sky-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/police-drones-sky-contd/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: david7134		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/police-drones-sky-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-171570</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david7134]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=31700#comment-171570</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know why this bothers you. Here in Louisiana, we will just shoot at them. I extends the hunting season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why this bothers you. Here in Louisiana, we will just shoot at them. I extends the hunting season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sum Dood		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/police-drones-sky-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-171569</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sum Dood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=31700#comment-171569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have no problem with being watched as long as I get to watch the watchers. 24/7 surveillance of all government officials. All online. All the time.

What do they have to hide?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem with being watched as long as I get to watch the watchers. 24/7 surveillance of all government officials. All online. All the time.</p>
<p>What do they have to hide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Smart dude		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/police-drones-sky-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-171566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=31700#comment-171566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The use of drones by an already out of control police apparatus is exceedingly totalitarian and has no place in a society if we human beings. The drones have to go.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of drones by an already out of control police apparatus is exceedingly totalitarian and has no place in a society if we human beings. The drones have to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/police-drones-sky-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-171565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=31700#comment-171565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the FAA approval should be blocked on privacy grounds. Those are two separate issues. I don&#039;t really object to drones for police or civilian use ... cheaper, safer, better. They can fly in weather that helicopters wont fly in. Do I really care that the police or traffic &#039;copter is a real person flying it or someone back at the airport? At the same time I don&#039;t need a thermal imaging system picking me up as I cut through the park (closed after dark) as I walk home. Maybe the drone should look at empty sky until a call comes in?

Someone needs to make the serious privacy argument separate from the safety argument.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the FAA approval should be blocked on privacy grounds. Those are two separate issues. I don&#8217;t really object to drones for police or civilian use &#8230; cheaper, safer, better. They can fly in weather that helicopters wont fly in. Do I really care that the police or traffic &#8216;copter is a real person flying it or someone back at the airport? At the same time I don&#8217;t need a thermal imaging system picking me up as I cut through the park (closed after dark) as I walk home. Maybe the drone should look at empty sky until a call comes in?</p>
<p>Someone needs to make the serious privacy argument separate from the safety argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
