<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Torts roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/torts-roundup-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/torts-roundup-3/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Attorney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/07/torts-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-169390</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Attorney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=31110#comment-169390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suppose comparative fault is more &quot;pro-plaintiff&quot; than contributory negligence (where if the plaintiff is just 1 percent liable, he recovers nothing), but a partner told me that juries ignore plaintiff negligence in cases where they want the plaintiff to win.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose comparative fault is more &#8220;pro-plaintiff&#8221; than contributory negligence (where if the plaintiff is just 1 percent liable, he recovers nothing), but a partner told me that juries ignore plaintiff negligence in cases where they want the plaintiff to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
