https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/32394/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:26:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/32394/comment-page-1/#comment-172825 Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:26:31 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32394#comment-172825 […] EPA 0; Federalism 1 […]

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/32394/comment-page-1/#comment-172751 Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:57:33 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32394#comment-172751 blech, I used <a> instead of <i>

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/32394/comment-page-1/#comment-172750 Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:56:05 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32394#comment-172750 There’s also a large blank spot at the top. There seem to be some words missing here: But the DC Circuit disagreed. The EPA issued rules that not only [something seems to be missing here] As Judge Kavanaugh stated,

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/32394/comment-page-1/#comment-172743 Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:22:48 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32394#comment-172743 I don’t really get what this has to do with federalism. It’s more an issue of congressional delegation of power. The EPA was acting in its quasi-legislative role without a grant of authority by Congress. Congress could, within the principles of federalism, allow the EPA to issue these regulations, or could itself pass a statute containing those regulations.

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/32394/comment-page-1/#comment-172742 Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:49:50 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32394#comment-172742 sorry about that – seems to come through ok on my computer, though.

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/32394/comment-page-1/#comment-172738 Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:20:55 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32394#comment-172738 There seem to be several sentences and some HTML code missing from this post.

]]>