<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: California&#8217;s Prop 37: Prop 65 in organic garb	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Food roundup - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-173659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Food roundup - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-173659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] thumbs down [editorial] &#8220;Natural&#8221; language a flashpoint [Glenn Lammi, WLF] Earlier here, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] thumbs down [editorial] &#8220;Natural&#8221; language a flashpoint [Glenn Lammi, WLF] Earlier here, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Food lawsuits...&lt;/strong&gt;

A New York Times story seems drafted from a press release as it implies that billionaire tobacco lawyers are successfully targeting the food industry. While it&#039;s true that food manufacturers have been cosseted with dozens of class actions over labelin...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Food lawsuits&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A New York Times story seems drafted from a press release as it implies that billionaire tobacco lawyers are successfully targeting the food industry. While it&#8217;s true that food manufacturers have been cosseted with dozens of class actions over labelin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NYT on California food labeling suits - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NYT on California food labeling suits - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 04:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Times does draw the link to Proposition 37, the lawyer-sponsored measure I wrote about last week, which could open up a basis for rich new suits based on failure to correctly affix [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Times does draw the link to Proposition 37, the lawyer-sponsored measure I wrote about last week, which could open up a basis for rich new suits based on failure to correctly affix [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John David Galt		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John David Galt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While I see nothing wrong with GM food per se, consumers ought to be allowed to find out what they&#039;re getting -- and correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I don&#039;t believe the FDA &lt;b&gt;allows&lt;/b&gt; most non-GM food to be labeled as such, even if both producers and consumers want to know it.

(I say &quot;most&quot; because some milk products are now labeled as coming from non-hormone-treated cattle.  I assume this is because foods under USDA jurisdiction are exempt from FDA rules.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I see nothing wrong with GM food per se, consumers ought to be allowed to find out what they&#8217;re getting &#8212; and correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but I don&#8217;t believe the FDA <b>allows</b> most non-GM food to be labeled as such, even if both producers and consumers want to know it.</p>
<p>(I say &#8220;most&#8221; because some milk products are now labeled as coming from non-hormone-treated cattle.  I assume this is because foods under USDA jurisdiction are exempt from FDA rules.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Squirrels		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172227</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Squirrels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Why does NO ONE point out that all foods are genetically modified? &lt;/i&gt; 

Because the terms &#039;genetically modified&#039; and GMO specifically refer to foods modified by genetic engineering as opposed to say crossing two kinds of tomatoes by pollination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why does NO ONE point out that all foods are genetically modified? </i> </p>
<p>Because the terms &#8216;genetically modified&#8217; and GMO specifically refer to foods modified by genetic engineering as opposed to say crossing two kinds of tomatoes by pollination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Preston		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Preston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why does NO ONE point out that all foods are genetically modified? Tomatoes, such as for sale at markets are hybrids, have been for over half-a-century and nobody has pointed out the &quot;dangers&quot;. Nobody has shown a contagion, allergy, or serious disease from eating genetically modified fruits, vegetables and proteins (meat, fish, fowl), yet all these foods come down through the centuries as GMO.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does NO ONE point out that all foods are genetically modified? Tomatoes, such as for sale at markets are hybrids, have been for over half-a-century and nobody has pointed out the &#8220;dangers&#8221;. Nobody has shown a contagion, allergy, or serious disease from eating genetically modified fruits, vegetables and proteins (meat, fish, fowl), yet all these foods come down through the centuries as GMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DensityDuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172222</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DensityDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Note that even if no bull sperm were ever in a lab, then we&#039;d have to label beef GMO, because beef cattle are not naturally-occuring animals.  They were specifically bred to be what they are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that even if no bull sperm were ever in a lab, then we&#8217;d have to label beef GMO, because beef cattle are not naturally-occuring animals.  They were specifically bred to be what they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mannie		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mannie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The quest for the substance that does NOT cause cancer in rats, continues.

It makes you wonder why rats haven&#039;t become extinct.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quest for the substance that does NOT cause cancer in rats, continues.</p>
<p>It makes you wonder why rats haven&#8217;t become extinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Burgess		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Burgess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t California already require labels warning against nearly every chemical known to man?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t California already require labels warning against nearly every chemical known to man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/08/californias-prop-37-prop-65-organic-garb/comment-page-1/#comment-172211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=32064#comment-172211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They should also require labels on non-genetic food that it is sprayed with more insccticide, and on &quot;organic food&quot; that it requires taking of more wild land and resources for no scientifically proven benefit to health.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should also require labels on non-genetic food that it is sprayed with more insccticide, and on &#8220;organic food&#8221; that it requires taking of more wild land and resources for no scientifically proven benefit to health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
