Comments on: About that “GMO food causes rat tumors” report https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:32:03 +0000 hourly 1 By: mojo https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-174138 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:32:03 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32991#comment-174138 Yeah, they deleted all my comments, then banned me, for making fun of the GMO-phobic.

I’m so ashamed…

]]> By: Bill Alexander https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-174112 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:48:28 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32991#comment-174112 I wouldn’t surprise me if the control group wasn’t larger before “that unfortunate accident.”

]]> By: Mannie https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-174111 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:03:57 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32991#comment-174111 They don’t want meaningful results. They want results that drive their agenda. So called Science cannot be trusted if there is money or agenda at stake. Peer review is meaningless. The only review that should be acceptable is adversarial review – a concerted effort to destroy the researcher’s conclusions. It’s called Red Team opposition.

]]> By: Richard Nieporent https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/09/about-gmo-food-causes-rat-tumors-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-174110 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:30:35 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=32991#comment-174110 It is amazing what passes for research nowadays. You would think a minimum understanding of statistics would be required before you did an experiment. How can you do a study with a small group of test subjects and a much smaller group of control subjects and expect to get meaningful results?

]]>