Comments on: “DOJ Intervenes In LSAT Disability Bias Class Action, Says ‘Flagging’ of Tests Violates ADA”

By: D

Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:25:30 +0000

It’s a cryin shame. The law school types shot themselves in the foot on that one. I need a tissue.

By: Jack Olson

Jack Olson — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:21:33 +0000

Once they become lawyers, does the ADA authorize them to take extra time to complete each legal task for clients? When a lawyer without a disability does that, it’s called bill padding.

By: Bumper

Bumper — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:26:53 +0000

Any professional (doctor, lawyer, accountant, etc.) who requires ADA assistance to get into or out of school should have to advertise as such, anything else it consumer fraud.

By: Anonymous Attorney

Anonymous Attorney — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:44:28 +0000

Damn. I could have gone to Harvard Law School, if only I’d had the right team of lawyers.

By: DEM

DEM — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:32:23 +0000

One supposes that, if accepted, the DOJ’s position would result in a surge of test-takers wih ADHD who “need” extra time. The only real difficulty in the LSAT is the time pressure. With ample extra time, just about anyone can achieve a very high score.

By: ShelbyC

ShelbyC — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:02:47 +0000

How can the DOJ’s position not violate the first amendment?