<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Politics roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/politics-roundup-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/politics-roundup-5/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Election roundup - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/politics-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-182360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Election roundup - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=33540#comment-182360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] and Retention Elections&#8221; [Carrie Severino, NRO, Ashby Jones/WSJ; earlier on Michigan here and here, on Florida here, here, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and Retention Elections&#8221; [Carrie Severino, NRO, Ashby Jones/WSJ; earlier on Michigan here and here, on Florida here, here, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The threat from Michigan&#8217;s Proposal 2 - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/politics-roundup-5/comment-page-1/#comment-180966</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The threat from Michigan&#8217;s Proposal 2 - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=33540#comment-180966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] The WSJ is reminding us again about the not-wholly-unrelated battle for the Michigan Supreme Court (earlier).  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The WSJ is reminding us again about the not-wholly-unrelated battle for the Michigan Supreme Court (earlier).  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
