Comments on: Update: New York high court rules 4-3 that lap dances are not “art” https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/update-new-york-high-court-rules-4-3-lap-dances-art/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:45:24 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mike https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/update-new-york-high-court-rules-4-3-lap-dances-art/comment-page-1/#comment-178238 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:45:24 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=33774#comment-178238 asdfasdf:

Be grateful for small mercies. They could have said that the argument was “fatally flawed.”

]]> By: asdfasdf https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/update-new-york-high-court-rules-4-3-lap-dances-art/comment-page-1/#comment-178035 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:21:44 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=33774#comment-178035 The majority carefully considered the constitutional arguments and after a thorough review of the First Amendment considerations, concluded:

“Petitioner’s remaining constitutional argument is unavailing.” (http://www.nycourts.gov/ctapps/Decisions/2012/Oct12/157mem12.pdf at 5).

Actually, those six words comprise the majority’s entire discussion of the First Amendment issues. No doubt they considered those issues deeply and carefully in private discussions, however.

]]> By: robert https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/update-new-york-high-court-rules-4-3-lap-dances-art/comment-page-1/#comment-177970 Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:31:33 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=33774#comment-177970 Rich people go to the ballet and don’t pay sales tax. Poor people go to the local strip club and do. Sounds fair to me!

]]>