<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Copyright and D.C. lobbying: that was fast	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/copyright-d-c-lobbying-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/copyright-d-c-lobbying-fast/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hugo S. Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/copyright-d-c-lobbying-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-184739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo S. Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34225#comment-184739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Congress should pass an &quot;Internet free library national policy act,&quot; establishing the eventual objective that anyone with a computer link anywhere in the country should have the same access to information as a physical visitor to the Library of Congress.

As an initial step in line with that policy, Congress could rule that a bona-fide search data-base (eg. Google&#039;s) is not a copyright infringement.

Over the longer term, Congress might authorize a friendly expropriation of Google&#039;s scanning library, to deploy the negotiating power of the US government against excessive demands by copyright trolls.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress should pass an &#8220;Internet free library national policy act,&#8221; establishing the eventual objective that anyone with a computer link anywhere in the country should have the same access to information as a physical visitor to the Library of Congress.</p>
<p>As an initial step in line with that policy, Congress could rule that a bona-fide search data-base (eg. Google&#8217;s) is not a copyright infringement.</p>
<p>Over the longer term, Congress might authorize a friendly expropriation of Google&#8217;s scanning library, to deploy the negotiating power of the US government against excessive demands by copyright trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
