<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: We *told* you UN treaties were a problem	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: silverpie		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverpie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is just my non-expert reading, but it sounds like a country can legalize it, with the proviso that they have to deal with their locals who are helping smuggle it into places that don&#039;t allow it. (kind of like paragraph 2 of the 21st Amendment)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just my non-expert reading, but it sounds like a country can legalize it, with the proviso that they have to deal with their locals who are helping smuggle it into places that don&#8217;t allow it. (kind of like paragraph 2 of the 21st Amendment)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jose		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184865</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also note only &quot;the leaves of the cannabis plant&quot; are being specified.  This leaves us with seeds and flowers/buds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also note only &#8220;the leaves of the cannabis plant&#8221; are being specified.  This leaves us with seeds and flowers/buds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jose		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The answer is in the text &quot;adopt such measures as may be necessary to prevent the misuse of, and illicit traffic in, the leaves of the cannabis plant.&quot;

Since it is now legal it is no longer illicit.  If it is used responsibly it is not being misused.

Case closed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is in the text &#8220;adopt such measures as may be necessary to prevent the misuse of, and illicit traffic in, the leaves of the cannabis plant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since it is now legal it is no longer illicit.  If it is used responsibly it is not being misused.</p>
<p>Case closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John David Galt		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John David Galt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The treaty does have a clause in it allowing withdrawal.  The President simply has to give notice to the UN.

I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s his unilateral decision or Congress has to be involved, but asking him to do it can&#039;t hurt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The treaty does have a clause in it allowing withdrawal.  The President simply has to give notice to the UN.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s his unilateral decision or Congress has to be involved, but asking him to do it can&#8217;t hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Nicholas		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184829</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Nicholas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AMcA, it&#039;s called &quot;ratifying a treaty&quot; and it&#039;s pretty much the exact opposite of outsourcing our sovereignty, seeing as how it is a domestic democratic process to agree to a proposal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMcA, it&#8217;s called &#8220;ratifying a treaty&#8221; and it&#8217;s pretty much the exact opposite of outsourcing our sovereignty, seeing as how it is a domestic democratic process to agree to a proposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Schwartz		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184797</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Spodula: It still violates Federal law even if it doesn&#039;t violate State law.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spodula: It still violates Federal law even if it doesn&#8217;t violate State law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AMcA		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184789</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AMcA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is what happens when we outsource our sovereignty.

Sorry, folks, this is no longer under your control.  Report to the General Secretary&#039;s office immediately for your spanking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens when we outsource our sovereignty.</p>
<p>Sorry, folks, this is no longer under your control.  Report to the General Secretary&#8217;s office immediately for your spanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Alexander		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Alexander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No US money, no UN.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No US money, no UN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No UN, no problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No UN, no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Malcolm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/we-told-un-treaties-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-184766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcolm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 01:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34268#comment-184766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AAAA -  But it this way: suppose the people of the United State petition their Government to change a law. The Government then replies: &quot;We&#039;re sorry, but we&#039;ve already promised foreign powers that we will govern you in this manner, and we can&#039;t break our promise.&quot;
What would be your reaction? Surely it would be: &quot;The government is supposed to be our servant, not our master. It has no mandate to make promises to us, but it cannot make promises to foreigners about how &lt;i&gt;we&lt;/i&gt; will be governed.&quot;
Making promises to foreigners about how those foreigners will be treated is, of course, a different matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAAA &#8211;  But it this way: suppose the people of the United State petition their Government to change a law. The Government then replies: &#8220;We&#8217;re sorry, but we&#8217;ve already promised foreign powers that we will govern you in this manner, and we can&#8217;t break our promise.&#8221;<br />
What would be your reaction? Surely it would be: &#8220;The government is supposed to be our servant, not our master. It has no mandate to make promises to us, but it cannot make promises to foreigners about how <i>we</i> will be governed.&#8221;<br />
Making promises to foreigners about how those foreigners will be treated is, of course, a different matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
