<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Why Firing a Bad Cop Is Damn Near Impossible&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/why-firing-bad-cop-is-damn-near-impossible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/why-firing-bad-cop-is-damn-near-impossible/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 22:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: ag		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/why-firing-bad-cop-is-damn-near-impossible/comment-page-1/#comment-181048</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=33935#comment-181048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;reasonable payback&quot;?  So since this woman (supposedly a criminal) lashes out at an officer, as criminals tend to do, the officer should be allowed to stoop to her level and retaliate against her? 

&quot;...everyone...deserves some slack when unreasonably provoked&quot;?  Common sense would tell you that if you have to handcuff a person, you should be on guard against that person lashing out at you in some way, not to mention that obviously a seated and handcuffed person doesn&#039;t present much of a threat. The officer could have taken one step backward and solved the problem.  If a person can&#039;t control his emotions better than that he should have chosen a different career.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;reasonable payback&#8221;?  So since this woman (supposedly a criminal) lashes out at an officer, as criminals tend to do, the officer should be allowed to stoop to her level and retaliate against her? </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;everyone&#8230;deserves some slack when unreasonably provoked&#8221;?  Common sense would tell you that if you have to handcuff a person, you should be on guard against that person lashing out at you in some way, not to mention that obviously a seated and handcuffed person doesn&#8217;t present much of a threat. The officer could have taken one step backward and solved the problem.  If a person can&#8217;t control his emotions better than that he should have chosen a different career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gasman		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/11/why-firing-bad-cop-is-damn-near-impossible/comment-page-1/#comment-180862</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gasman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 03:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=33935#comment-180862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The woman who got the boot to the head did get reasonable payback for her actions.  Cops do have to abide by the law, but everyone, even cops,  deserves some slack when unreasonably provoked.  
The other cases are less forgivable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The woman who got the boot to the head did get reasonable payback for her actions.  Cops do have to abide by the law, but everyone, even cops,  deserves some slack when unreasonably provoked.<br />
The other cases are less forgivable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
