<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Disabled rights roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/12/disabled-rights-roundup-ii-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/12/disabled-rights-roundup-ii-3/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerryskids		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/12/disabled-rights-roundup-ii-3/comment-page-1/#comment-193905</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerryskids]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=31863#comment-193905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do you have any other link to the Wendy&#039;s/EEOC story? Everything I can find with a quick Googling has pretty much the same EEOC press release as the link you provide. I sure would like to hear Wendy&#039;s side of the story. 

I suspect part of the reluctance to hire a deaf person is the safety issue - if there is a fire or a robbery or even a spill on the floor, it is harder to warn a deaf person of the danger. 

 A more important issue may be that fast food places don&#039;t hire &#039;cooks&#039;; regardless of what position you are hired for you are trained on how to operate the cash register and are expected to be able to fill in taking customer orders in a pinch. Does the deaf guy get exempted from this? Not being required to deal with the idiot customers may seem like a &#039;reasonable accomodation&#039; to the EEOC but I suspect the other workers would not be very happy about the deaf guy getting &#039;special treatment&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any other link to the Wendy&#8217;s/EEOC story? Everything I can find with a quick Googling has pretty much the same EEOC press release as the link you provide. I sure would like to hear Wendy&#8217;s side of the story. </p>
<p>I suspect part of the reluctance to hire a deaf person is the safety issue &#8211; if there is a fire or a robbery or even a spill on the floor, it is harder to warn a deaf person of the danger. </p>
<p> A more important issue may be that fast food places don&#8217;t hire &#8216;cooks&#8217;; regardless of what position you are hired for you are trained on how to operate the cash register and are expected to be able to fill in taking customer orders in a pinch. Does the deaf guy get exempted from this? Not being required to deal with the idiot customers may seem like a &#8216;reasonable accomodation&#8217; to the EEOC but I suspect the other workers would not be very happy about the deaf guy getting &#8216;special treatment&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
