<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Maryland law clinic follies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/12/maryland-law-clinic-follies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/12/maryland-law-clinic-follies/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The ASPCA&#8217;s lawsuit debacle - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/12/maryland-law-clinic-follies/comment-page-1/#comment-198139</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The ASPCA&#8217;s lawsuit debacle - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=35038#comment-198139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] in the piece I draw a parallel to the recently dismissed Hudson Farm litigation in Maryland, in which a judge lambasted Waterkeeper Alliance for shoddy litigation conduct in a Clean Water Act [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in the piece I draw a parallel to the recently dismissed Hudson Farm litigation in Maryland, in which a judge lambasted Waterkeeper Alliance for shoddy litigation conduct in a Clean Water Act [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marco73		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/12/maryland-law-clinic-follies/comment-page-1/#comment-197202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marco73]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=35038#comment-197202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If anyone thinks that for one second the Waterkeeper Alliance or UM are done with this case, just read the last line of the editorial:
&quot;At the University of Maryland, they say they&#039;re reviewing the judge&#039;s order in hopes of finding some grounds for appeal.&quot;
They&#039;ll be done with this case when someone cuts off their funding, not a moment before.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone thinks that for one second the Waterkeeper Alliance or UM are done with this case, just read the last line of the editorial:<br />
&#8220;At the University of Maryland, they say they&#8217;re reviewing the judge&#8217;s order in hopes of finding some grounds for appeal.&#8221;<br />
They&#8217;ll be done with this case when someone cuts off their funding, not a moment before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
