<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jeopardy: &#8220;New York Times editorials&#8221; for $100	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/01/jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/01/jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeffrey Toobin on recess appointments - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/01/jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100/comment-page-1/#comment-200041</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey Toobin on recess appointments - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=35699#comment-200041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Yorker&#8217;s readers deserve a better law analyst than Jeffrey Toobin? In his rant against the Canning decision, notes Ed Whelan, &#8220;Toobin asserts that there has never before been a &#8216;legal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yorker&#8217;s readers deserve a better law analyst than Jeffrey Toobin? In his rant against the Canning decision, notes Ed Whelan, &#8220;Toobin asserts that there has never before been a &#8216;legal [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kyle		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/01/jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100/comment-page-1/#comment-199892</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=35699#comment-199892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wally, 

I&#039;ll tell you basically the same thing I told Ted Frank when he objected to another New York Times story a while back -- I think it&#039;s quaint that you seem to believe that the Times still can be shamed back to editorial integrity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wally, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you basically the same thing I told Ted Frank when he objected to another New York Times story a while back &#8212; I think it&#8217;s quaint that you seem to believe that the Times still can be shamed back to editorial integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
