Comments on: Police taping, with a HIPAA twist

By: Richard Nieporent

Richard Nieporent — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:16:24 +0000

Incidents like this will not stop until the police are held civilly and or criminally liable for violating the rights of the public. If the police officer really doesn’t know the law then he should be fired for incompetence. If he deliberately violates the law he should be held criminally liable. Unfortunately the best that will happen will be that Mr. Henderson wins a lawsuit against the police department and it is the taxpayers who have to pay the damage award.

By: Ron Miller

Ron Miller — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:40:56 +0000

boblipton, I’m heavily pro police. But I agree with you 100% on this one.

By: Bob Neal

Bob Neal — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:43:49 +0000

and what about the liberty interest here? There is no accountability to the police – this is getting worse in this country, not better.

By: boblipton

boblipton — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:06:21 +0000

Ron, wouldn’t it be better if the police did pull this s**t in the first place? Then there wouldn’t have to be idiotic publicity, a struggle involving time and expense and no fear that the cops were out of control?

Bob

By: Ron Miller

Ron Miller — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:58:03 +0000

I agree although I think some states have laws that mirror or are even stronger than HIPAA. Be that as it may, the officer’s contention is silly and this will all get worked out with charges getting dropped, apologies, and whatnot.

By: Supremecourtjester

Supremecourtjester — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:26:41 +0000

There is no state court jurisdiction over HIPAA violations. Criminal prosecutions must be in the federal courts.

By: ParatrooperJJ

ParatrooperJJ — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:29:06 +0000

Any HIPPA violation would be a federal problem not a state one anyways.

By: KDP

KDP — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:43:02 +0000

I’ve been following this at a photography / 1st Amendment interest site. The general opinion is that many of these type stories of law enforcement are either ignorant of established cases concerning recording in public or are just stupid, vindictive thugs who make up the law as they go along.

I believe that the latter applies in this case. HIPPA has absolutely no bearing on the charges brought against the defendant. A LEO with more than thirty years experience should know better.