<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: April 17 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/april-19-roundup-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/april-19-roundup-4/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DEM		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/april-19-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-207953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DEM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=36925#comment-207953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The response of the former social security administrators is quite telling:  in their view, any attack on the status quo, no matter how data-intensive, is &quot;anecdotal.&quot;  Ironically, that dodge is followed by their own meaningless generalities:  hey the statutes impose strict criteria!  SSA employees are doing their level best!  Ah, ok then, nothing to see here, I guess.  Whenever government administrators speak to the dedication and hard work of their employees, reach for your wallet.

Of course, how can the disability criteria be strict if many of the conditions that qualify as disabilities are inherently unverifiable?  If you say you have back pain, as just one example, then you have it.  That a doctor also says so is nearly meaningless -- he&#039;s just parroting the patient -- and if you visit enough doctors, you&#039;ll always find one sympathetic enough to validate your pain.  That&#039;s especially true when many doctors are basically expert witnesses for the SS disability bar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The response of the former social security administrators is quite telling:  in their view, any attack on the status quo, no matter how data-intensive, is &#8220;anecdotal.&#8221;  Ironically, that dodge is followed by their own meaningless generalities:  hey the statutes impose strict criteria!  SSA employees are doing their level best!  Ah, ok then, nothing to see here, I guess.  Whenever government administrators speak to the dedication and hard work of their employees, reach for your wallet.</p>
<p>Of course, how can the disability criteria be strict if many of the conditions that qualify as disabilities are inherently unverifiable?  If you say you have back pain, as just one example, then you have it.  That a doctor also says so is nearly meaningless &#8212; he&#8217;s just parroting the patient &#8212; and if you visit enough doctors, you&#8217;ll always find one sympathetic enough to validate your pain.  That&#8217;s especially true when many doctors are basically expert witnesses for the SS disability bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Eggers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/april-19-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-207882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Eggers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=36925#comment-207882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Poor guy, thinking conspiracy theorists won&#039;t be able to find some way to connect the US government to the Boston attacks.  They already &quot;know&quot; it was a pre-planned false flag attack.  That&#039;s their starting point.  That plus 2 misinterpreted Twitter messages and its a proven fact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor guy, thinking conspiracy theorists won&#8217;t be able to find some way to connect the US government to the Boston attacks.  They already &#8220;know&#8221; it was a pre-planned false flag attack.  That&#8217;s their starting point.  That plus 2 misinterpreted Twitter messages and its a proven fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
