<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Feds demand ideologically confessional &#8220;corrective ads&#8221; from tobacco companies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/feds-demand-ideological-confessional-corrective-ads-tobacco-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/feds-demand-ideological-confessional-corrective-ads-tobacco-companies/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Nicholas		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/feds-demand-ideological-confessional-corrective-ads-tobacco-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-207644</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Nicholas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=37553#comment-207644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gosh it&#039;s about time we do this. This should have been part of the tobacco settlements in the 90s. Just like Apple was forced to admit on their website that Samsung didn&#039;t infringe their patents, this is an appropriate step to correct the public record after decades of intentional lies on the part of the tobacco companies. Nobody is allowed to use lies to prop up their business and it is wholly appropriate to regulate truth in commerce. Good job, nanny state!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh it&#8217;s about time we do this. This should have been part of the tobacco settlements in the 90s. Just like Apple was forced to admit on their website that Samsung didn&#8217;t infringe their patents, this is an appropriate step to correct the public record after decades of intentional lies on the part of the tobacco companies. Nobody is allowed to use lies to prop up their business and it is wholly appropriate to regulate truth in commerce. Good job, nanny state!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/feds-demand-ideological-confessional-corrective-ads-tobacco-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-207626</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=37553#comment-207626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is either confession or the &lt;strike&gt;Ministry of Truth&lt;/strike&gt; Department of Justice releases the rats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is either confession or the <strike>Ministry of Truth</strike> Department of Justice releases the rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Burgess		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/feds-demand-ideological-confessional-corrective-ads-tobacco-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-207554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Burgess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=37553#comment-207554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey! China&#039;s Cultural Revolution went so well, why not emulate it here?

Besides, if confession is good for the soul, isn&#039;t self-&lt;strike&gt;denunciation&lt;/strike&gt;confession at least as good for the lawyers who will then promptly file suit?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! China&#8217;s Cultural Revolution went so well, why not emulate it here?</p>
<p>Besides, if confession is good for the soul, isn&#8217;t self-<strike>denunciation</strike>confession at least as good for the lawyers who will then promptly file suit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
