<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NYT breaks open Pigford case, cont&#8217;d	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/nyt-breaks-open-pigford-case-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/nyt-breaks-open-pigford-case-contd/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: May 14 roundup - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/nyt-breaks-open-pigford-case-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-213049</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[May 14 roundup - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=37900#comment-213049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] journalists get the Pigford scandal so wrong?&#8221; [Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic; earlier here, here, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] journalists get the Pigford scandal so wrong?&#8221; [Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic; earlier here, here, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/04/nyt-breaks-open-pigford-case-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-210561</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=37900#comment-210561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like the NY Times is indulging in some real reporting. Now that the election is over and Obama is safely elected, the Times aims to recapture some credibility. I have noticed this as a pattern with both the Times and other Democratic party newspapers. When the 2014 election seaso0n starts, expect the Times to revert to its role as the party organ.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the NY Times is indulging in some real reporting. Now that the election is over and Obama is safely elected, the Times aims to recapture some credibility. I have noticed this as a pattern with both the Times and other Democratic party newspapers. When the 2014 election seaso0n starts, expect the Times to revert to its role as the party organ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
