<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pending ADA regulations menace Internet freedom	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/alert-pending-ada-for-the-web-regs-menace-online-freedom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/alert-pending-ada-for-the-web-regs-menace-online-freedom/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/alert-pending-ada-for-the-web-regs-menace-online-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-213047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38198#comment-213047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You should have a button that makes everything in UPPER CASE. (FOR THE HARD OF HEARING.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have a button that makes everything in UPPER CASE. (FOR THE HARD OF HEARING.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Rohan		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/alert-pending-ada-for-the-web-regs-menace-online-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-212310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Rohan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 09:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38198#comment-212310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t worry about this too much. No matter how the Obama administration wants to apply the law, there are two big monkey wrenches to deal with.

1. The Government runs and depends on a lot of web sites themselves. If they apply the ADA to businesses, they will have to follow it as well. Good luck with that. In fact, Netflix&#039;s best argument would have been to point out that DOJ sites are not handicapped accessible!

2. If the standards are applied, then all web sites will base themselves overseas and get around the ban that way. That would leave the federal govt and the states the only ones left.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry about this too much. No matter how the Obama administration wants to apply the law, there are two big monkey wrenches to deal with.</p>
<p>1. The Government runs and depends on a lot of web sites themselves. If they apply the ADA to businesses, they will have to follow it as well. Good luck with that. In fact, Netflix&#8217;s best argument would have been to point out that DOJ sites are not handicapped accessible!</p>
<p>2. If the standards are applied, then all web sites will base themselves overseas and get around the ban that way. That would leave the federal govt and the states the only ones left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: aaaa		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/alert-pending-ada-for-the-web-regs-menace-online-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-212286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aaaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 06:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38198#comment-212286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believed that any site that is text + html and does not use flash for navigation is already accommodated for disabled. Is there something else demanded in ADA? The article is not specific on that threat and does not link specifics.

They have tools that reads them whatever is normally printed on page. 

Thinking about it, breaking copyright protections in order to accommodate to blind or deaf would still break DMCA and possibly CFAA. So those who use them might have to do something special, but that is a threat only to big businesses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believed that any site that is text + html and does not use flash for navigation is already accommodated for disabled. Is there something else demanded in ADA? The article is not specific on that threat and does not link specifics.</p>
<p>They have tools that reads them whatever is normally printed on page. </p>
<p>Thinking about it, breaking copyright protections in order to accommodate to blind or deaf would still break DMCA and possibly CFAA. So those who use them might have to do something special, but that is a threat only to big businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Canvasback		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/05/alert-pending-ada-for-the-web-regs-menace-online-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-212275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canvasback]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 05:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=38198#comment-212275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now that alcoholism is a disability does that mean my website will have to repeat everything 3 times and then send a reminder email in the morning? And yet, as as arbiter of good taste and a concerned person, I can help you make a tasteful,  conforming website with a minimum of permitting errors. Please don&#039;t hesitate to submit your ideas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that alcoholism is a disability does that mean my website will have to repeat everything 3 times and then send a reminder email in the morning? And yet, as as arbiter of good taste and a concerned person, I can help you make a tasteful,  conforming website with a minimum of permitting errors. Please don&#8217;t hesitate to submit your ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
